This is a prototype of a new “3D” antenna made by printing a new nano material onto a curved surface. It’s supposed to give up to 3 times better signal than the majority of mainstream antennas. And the one’s that made it are some researchers at the university of illinois. Now what i have to ask, isn’t this so obvious that it just should’ve been made a lot earlier. Printing thin metal “snakes” on the inside of a device’s chassis.
New 3D antenna technology, why wasn't this done before?
by Johny · March 20, 2011
Tags: antenna technologyantennaschassismainstreammajoritysnakessurfacetechnologythin metaluniversity
Johny (John-Erik) Krahbichler is the CEO and main author of Gadgetzz, since 2009. While Mr. Krahbichler's expertise is in consumer electronics, his true passion is science´, and educating the world about the universe we inhabit. Check out the non-profit Scientific Literacy Matters Currently Johny is using his experience from covering trade shows such as the CES, to work with trade show exhibition marketing.
WHY DID IT TAKE SO LONG
WELL NOW, I WILL BE BLUNT WITH A EXPLANATION.
MORE THAN A CENTURY AGO MAXWELL PROVIDED TO THE SCIENCE COMMUNITY HIS FINDINGS IN A UNCOMPLETED FORM.
WHEN HE PROVIDED HIS MATHEMATICS TO SUBSTANTIATE HIS LAWS HE PROVIDED INCOMPLETE FORMULA.
HE ALWAYS STATED THAT MAGNETISM WAS PART OF RADIATION
SO THAT WHEN MAGNETISM CAME ABOUT IN HIS FINDINGS HE STOPPED IN MID FIELD WITH THE MATHEMATICS.
FOR ANY EQUATION ONE MUST REDUCE IT TO A MINIMUM
NUMBER OF VARIABLE WHICH ,IF FOLLOWED, WOULD PROVIDE
A SINGLE VECTOR OF ONE FOR TOTAL ELECTRICAL ENERGY
AND THE REMOVAL OF THE MAGNETIC VECTOR.
NO BODY IN THE SCIENTIFIC WORLD HAS REVISED SCIENCE
TO REFLECT THE ABOVE THUS IT HAS BEEN IGNORED SUCH THAT IT DISTORTED SCIENCE
IF SCIENCE UPDATED OR COMPLETED THE MATHEMATICS WE
WOULD HAVE THE ANSWER ROOM TEMPERATURE SUPER CONDUCTIVITY IN FRONT OF ALL.
I DON’T KNOW HOW WE CAN GET A SCIENTIFIC UPDATE SO CORRECTION MAY WELL LAST TO THE NEXT CENTURY OR MORE.
SCIENCE DOES NOT ACCEPT APPROACHES FROM OUTSIDE THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY .
SO THE QUESTION COULD BE WHY DOES IT TAKE SO LONG TO UPDATE BOOKS USED AT THE PRESENT TIME IN UNIVERSITY EDUCATION.
WE LOSE 20% OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY IN PRESENT ELECTRICAL
GRID SYSTEMS THE THE PRESENT ASK FOR A CORRECTIVE SOLUTION BUT THAT IS BEING WITH HELD.
WHO WILL BREAK THE FENCES THAT SCIENCE HAS PUT UP?
SORRY TO BE SO BLUNT, BUT I DO NOT WANT ANOTHER DECADE OR MORE TO PASS UNTIL CORRECTIONS ARE MADE OR THE SOCIETY EXAMINE MY FINDINGS.
The above circuit is the Meander circuit of a plate capacitor or a Slab wave guide. A plate capacitor can block a magnetic field or a electric field.
When two plates are open ended as a source and a load it becomes a loss less distribution of energy and will provide a flicker free dc current flow that when used with lamp bulbs provides a much more economics
regardless of energy shape applied and always with a constant resistive impedance. This is the backbone of multi frequency antennas using meta materials. This same circuit which you also see as a light sensor is the circuit for loss less change of state of energy such as transformation to light where it can be replaced with aluminum window screening,Also for radio radiation where unlike Maxwell the magnetic moment is changed to electric charge..There is no rotary vector in
Newtons laws so Maxwell erred by adding a + sign for the displacement current. If the Yagi that followed ignored the + sign then magnetic coupling would have been replaced by capacitive coupling making it a loss less radiator in the form of a multi plate capacitor. After all without
the the displacement current there is no skin effect and thus the electric charge travels along the loss less dielectric channel.
Now by correcting Maxwell’s error one has brought into line the vectors associated with Newtons laws to the optics area which it should never have left.
So you may well ask why it took so long for the above radiator. It is because scientists never corrected Maxwell’s equations and will fight to the limit to prevent a non physics person to divulge it after many many years of being introduces to it. That includes college professors’ and even engineers at the northern Illinois Particle labs. I might add this virus has spread thru out physics even to those at CERN. It has been more than 150 years this virus has been present and you wonder why things take so long in the physics of today. I have pointed to the generation of super conductivity and energy distribution in the above which requires a repelling action between magnetism and diamagnetism that makes a spacial medium for the radiation vector at a very low height.
Will the physics people reject room temperature super conductivity
as well now that it is presented on a plate? Or a loss less light bulb with the ballast replaced with back to back capacitors and a non inductive
filament that cannot be ruined by harmonics and all in the glass container? You now have the means for point radiation why turn the other way?
I discussed this many many years ago with the U of I lab and details of the meetings are on record on the net archives.I literally pointed out the mistakes in physics that prevented it from being discovered earlier.
The error I alluded to is still uncorrected in the field of science and is directly connected to superconductivity
I still have all the records and samples with purchase reciepts if you want to pursue.I hope she did not do an end run and try to patent it
You have a real scoop on your hands by asking why it has not been done before as I can supply details that back me up